<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshopped images in flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sriniani.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/photoshopped-images-in-flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sriniani.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/photoshopped-images-in-flickr/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Santhosh</title>
		<link>http://sriniani.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/photoshopped-images-in-flickr/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Santhosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sriniani.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Flickr did start as a place where people could post their photographs. But the overload of too-much-photoshopped pictures has probably brought about this debate whether Flickr should allow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flickr did start as a place where people could post their photographs. But the overload of too-much-photoshopped pictures has probably brought about this debate whether Flickr should allow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazybug</title>
		<link>http://sriniani.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/photoshopped-images-in-flickr/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>lazybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sriniani.wordpress.com/?p=102#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Being a photography enthusiast, usage of Photoshop is inevitable for me. I agree that it can bring out the best in any photograph...but after an extent of Photoshopping, the image ceizes to be a photograph...one can call it a piece of art...but not a photograph!

PS I use a open source version of PS called Gimp. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a photography enthusiast, usage of Photoshop is inevitable for me. I agree that it can bring out the best in any photograph&#8230;but after an extent of Photoshopping, the image ceizes to be a photograph&#8230;one can call it a piece of art&#8230;but not a photograph!</p>
<p>PS I use a open source version of PS called Gimp. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
